Reaper daw3/15/2023 ![]() ![]() This gives me a wide range of creative possibilities when shaping the final sound of my project. I have access to built-in equalization, compression, and reverb, as well as the ability to use third-party VST/AU plugins. Furthermore, the variety of effects and processing tools available in Reaper are also extremely useful for post-production work. The support for a wide range of audio formats makes it easy for me to import and work with multiple audio tracks in a single project, allowing me to edit dialogue, sound effects, and background music separately and then mix them together for the final output. However, it does not include built-in video editing features.Īs a hobby video editor, I have found that one of the biggest benefits of using Reaper for film and video post-production is its multitrack recording and editing capabilities. Experienced users will also come across features they need that are missing, with feature requests dating back years.Ĭomments: Reaper is a powerful and versatile digital audio workstation that is suitable for post-production work in film and video. Furthermore, there are some very counterintuitive functions, like using right-click to select audio clips (trying to change this in Preferences is a real headache that I could never resolve) that will cause headaches for new users. REAPER's interface can be very intimidating, with extremely small, hard-to-read fonts, and no included instruments or sounds. REAPER is definitely a contender for the "best DAW". The small footprint and low price explains why it has such a large, loyal user base, and the powerful batch tools show why REAPER has wide adoption in the gaming industry. REAPER is almost limitless in scope: virtually everything about the app can be customized, with powerful actions (macros) and scripts that can automate complex tasks. ![]() But I would happily recommend it as a fully professional DAW. But ultimately, REAPER is a bit too much of an odd duck for me. Once I dug into Actions, I immediately missed it on other DAWs. But that being said, REAPER is incredibly fast, light, and reliable. Despite REAPER's customizability, I could never change this to work like other DAWs. I often would summon a right-click menu instead of a selection and you still use the standard left-click selection for most things, causing more confusion. The right-click mouse selection was particularly painful: no other DAW works like this, and it's hard to see what the benefit of this is. ![]() Not that our business model relies on that, but it definitely helped in the beginning.Īnyway, I know replying to this is probably pointless, but I guess I had to weigh in.Comments: I had to learn REAPER for a gaming audio job, and it was very tough to get used to coming from Pro Tools, Cubase, et al., compared to other DAWs. I should also mention that running a business this way is extremely enjoyable for the employees, and people (at least the ones I would want to work with) will value enjoying their job enough that you probably don't have to pay them as much as say, someone who works for a company they hate. All of these things are overhead, and while they often do help pay for themselves by potentially increasing sales, it is still overhead. For example:ġ) we only have one version of REAPER no variations that would require more work/support/etc (other than per-platform versions, which is inevitable)Ģ) we design our licensing scheme to require the least amount of engineering and customer support possible (hence, no dongles, C/R, disabled features, forced timeouts, etc).ģ) we do not advertise, have booths at trade shows, or sell via retailers, etc. I would like to point out that our business is designed to be as simple and pure as possible, to keep our overhead low (which then makes it easier to be profitable, and makes our products more attractive to the users). At worst, hosting is cheap, especially when you consider the scale of our traffic. I've had previous projects hosted by fans, and host friends stuff routinely. ![]() I was a reasonable investor, not looking for huge immediate returns, instead wanting long term sustainability, which may be slightly more unusual.Īs far as hosting goes, it is very easy, when you making something people like, to get free hosting. My parents would not have asked for a return on their investment, which I do not believe to be uncommon.Ģ) I did invest a small amount of my own money into Cockos before it was profitable, and that money has long since been repaid. I can concede that it often should take some investment to start a business like this, however:ġ) I could have just as easily started Cockos/REAPER with absolutely no money, second hand hardware, etc, and living with my parents for a year or so. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |